You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Assessing agricultural practices and insecticides resistance for effective malaria vector control in northwestern Iran

Abstract

Background

After three years with no local transmission of malaria, an outbreak occurred in Iran in 2022. Key malaria control methods in Iran are including indoor residual spraying (IRS), long-lasting insecticide-treated nets (LLINs), and prompt diagnosis and treatment of malaria cases. Anopheles sacharovi is one of the main malaria vectors in Iran. This study aimed to determine the insecticides resistance status of An. sacharovi in northwestern Iran, to inform effective vector control programs in this region.

Methods

Larval stages of An. sacharovi were collected from various larval habitats located in the villages along the Aras River. Adult susceptibility tests were performed on An. sacharovi using diagnostic doses of insecticides accordance to World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines. The study also evaluated agricultural insecticide and fertilizer usage alongside the presence of natural mosquito predators in breeding sites in the study area.

Results

Alongside various chemicals such as silica, humic acid, superphosphate, sulfur, urea, and solupotasse at different dose levels, organophosphorus and pyrethroid insecticides are commonly used in rice fields and orchards. Anopheles sacharovi displayed diverse reactions to insecticides, demonstrating resistance to DDT but sensitivity to malathion, and showing similar reactions to carbamate and pyrethroid insecticides.

Conclusions

These results provide significant insights into agricultural practices and the presence of mosquito larvae in the study area. The extensive use of a specific herbicide illustrates its popularity among farmers for weed control, while other agricultural products focus on enhancing soil fertility and productivity. The absence of mosquito larvae in habitats with predators indicates the usefulness of these predators in controlling the population of mosquitoes. The resistance of mosquitoes to certain insecticides highlights the need for careful selection and intermittent use of insecticides in vector control programs. These findings can inform the development of targeted strategies to reduce malaria transmission risks. Further research is essential for assessing the effectiveness of these interventions.

Introduction

Over 80% of the global population resides in regions vulnerable to arthropod-borne diseases [1, 2]. Mosquito, as one of the most important vectors, is involved in the transmission of a wide variety of parasites, viruses, and bacteria affecting both humans and animals [3]. According to reports by the World Health Organization (WHO), there were an estimated 249 million new cases and 608,000 deaths of malaria globally in 2022, primarily in malaria-endemic countries [4]. Iran, as part of the WHO Eastern Mediterranean Region (EMRO), has made significant progress in malaria elimination. The country has successfully reduced malaria cases in recent years; however, outbreaks reported from southeastern Iran since 2022 have raised concerns about the risk of malaria re-emergence in other regions [5].

In 2022, the country experienced a resurgence of the disease, with approximately 1,432 locally acquired malaria cases (total cases reaching 5,677), representing a tenfold increase compared to the previous year. Furthermore, in 2023, the number of confirmed cases doubled compared to the same period in the prior year, culminating in a total of 9868 cases. This fluctuation underscores the ongoing challenges in malaria control efforts within the region [4].

As vectors of malaria, Anopheles mosquitoes transmit Plasmodium parasites and are broadly distributed across all continents [6]. In Iran, 28 definitive species, including seven main malaria vectors such as Anopheles stephensi, Anopheles culicifacies, Anopheles sacharovi, Anopheles fluviatilis, Anopheles superpictus, Anopheles maculipennis, and Anopheles dthali have been documented [7]. Notably, An. sacharovi has a more localized distribution in central, northwestern, and southwestern Iran and played a crucial role during malaria outbreaks in northwestern regions [7, 8].

In Iran, the primary control methods during the malaria elimination phase are indoor residual spraying (IRS), free distribution of long-lasting insecticide-treated nets (LLINs), and early diagnosis and prompt treatment of malaria cases [9].

Research suggests that continuous and excessive use of insecticides can lead to resistance development in mosquito populations over time, as prolonged exposure allows them to develop mechanisms to survive despite the presence of the chemicals [10,11,12,13].

The use of agricultural insecticides and chemical or biological fertilizers, which are natural substances containing living microorganisms and enhance soil fertility and promote plant growth, can significantly impact the resistance of mosquitoes, particularly in species such as Anopheles arabiensis [14, 15]. Herbicides affect the timing of larval pupation, alter adult longevity, and influence susceptibility to insecticides, underscoring the importance of herbicide management in both agriculture and malaria control efforts [16].

Traditional insecticides are expensive, cause resistance in mosquitoes and also have adverse effects on non-target organisms, but biological control methods, such as the use of fish, dragonfly nymph, copepods, and certain mosquito species, are not only cheap and and effective in eliminating the mosquito populations, but they also do not have negative effects on non-target organisms [17].

Khoda-Afarin County, currently free of local malaria transmission, experienced an outbreak in 1998 due to imported cases following the conflict between Azerbaijan and Armenia, with local transmission persisting for 15 years [18]. During the period of local transmission, various control measures, including chemical control and environmental managements, were implemented during that period. Also, agricultural practices shifted from paddy farming to cotton cultivation to reduce the breeding habitats for Anopheles mosquitoes [18]. Today, as there is no local transmission, agricultural practices have shifted back to paddy farming, inadvertently creating ideal breeding places for An. sacharovi during the hot season, which lasts for approximately 6 months in the study area [19].

Given the recent increase in malaria cases across Iran, it is crucial to understand the susceptibility status of An. sacharovi to various WHO-recommended insecticides, especially in areas with numerous mosquito breeding sites such as the Aras River basin. This study evaluated the resistance status of An. sacharovi to pyrethroids, carbamates, organochlorines, and organophosphates to inform effective vector control strategies in the area. Additionally, the research investigated the usage of pesticides, herbicides, and chemical and organic fertilizers by rice farmers, as these practices can influence mosquito resistance. Furthermore, the presence of natural larval predators in the study areas was assessed as well to explore potential integrated control measures against mosquito populations.

Methods

Study area

Khoda-Afarin County is located in the northwest of Iran, bordered by Armenia and Azerbaijan to the north, Kaleybar County to the east, and Varzaghan and Jolfa Counties to the south and west, respectively. It is situated at approximately 38° 50′ 0" North latitude and 45° 32′ 0" East longitude. The elevation of the region ranges from 1,200 to 3,000 m above sea level and is surrounded by the Caucasus mountains, which create a unique microclimate by shielding it from cold winds. The Aras River serves as a significant natural border between Iran, Armenia, and Azerbaijan, playing a crucial role in providing irrigation, drinking water, and hydroelectric power. Additionally, the river supports diverse plant and animal life, including mosquitoes. This region experiences a continental climate with hot summers (temperatures reaching up to 35–40°C) and cold, snowy winters. The significant temperature fluctuations facilitate rice cultivation, that thrives due to the abundant water supply from the Aras River [20] (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Study area, Khoda-Afarin County, northwest of Iran

Collecting the specimens

The study was conducted from June to the end of July 2023. Anopheles sacharovi larvae were collected from various breeding sites within 12 Aras riverside villages (Sup. 1) using a standard dipping method. All biological materials of larvae and pupae were placed in special containers previously coded and transported to the Insectarium for Species identification [21] and the lifting of the mosquito colony under standardized laboratory conditions of temperature (27 ± 2°C), relative humidity (75 ± 10%) and photoperiod of 12:12 (day and night), for later use in susceptibility bioassays with F1 [22].

Agricultural practices, chemical usage, and natural predators

Simultaneously with the collection of mosquito larvae, a structured questionnaire was administered to assess agricultural practices, including the types of fertilizers, herbicides, and pesticides used. Questions were directed at farmers to inquire specifically about the types of pesticides and herbicides employed, as well as both chemical and organic fertilizers. Participants were also asked to provide samples of these consumables when possible. Additionally, interviews were conducted with local vendors of fertilizers and pesticides to confirm and supplement the information gathered from farmers.

Furthermore, during visits to each rice farm where larval collection occurred, the presence of mosquito larvae predators was also evaluated. This evaluation is critical for understanding the dynamics of mosquito population control in this region.

Adult susceptibility tests

To assess the susceptibility of An. sacharovi to different insecticides, WHO guidelines for diagnostic doses were followed. Four replicate exposure tests were conducted for each insecticide, with 20–25 female mosquitoes per test. Additionally, two control tests with 50 mosquitoes were performed using papers impregnated solely with carrier oil. The insecticides tested included bendiocarb (0.1%), permethrin (0.75%), malathion (5%), DDT (4%), and deltamethrin (0.05%). Tests utilized sugar-fed F0 progeny of wild-caught adult females aged 3–5 days. Before testing, the susceptibility test kits were thoroughly cleaned with detergent and tap water. Insecticide-impregnated papers were placed in labeled tubes, alongside control tubes without insecticide for comparability [23, 24].

Mosquitoes were exposed for 60 min, followed by a 24-h recovery period with a cotton wool pad soaked in a 10% sugar solution. Mortality rates were recorded at the end of each test. Susceptibility was determined based on these rates: control mortality below 5% is acceptable, whereas rates between 5–20% were adjusted using Abbott's formula. Tests with control mortality above 20% were invalid and would be repeated. According to WHO guidelines, mortality rates of 98–100% indicated susceptibility, while rates of 90–97% flagged potential resistance, necessitating further confirmation. Rates below 90% were classified as resistant [23, 24].

Results

Data collected from completed questionnaires regarding plants cultivated and the chemicals and organic materials used in the fields across the 12 studied villages revealed that 75% of rice farmers used bispyribac sodium herbicides, 25% used silica, 58% used humic acid, and 50% employed superphosphate, 8.3% used sulfur, 83% utilized urea, and 25% applied fertilizers. The use of organophosphorus and pyrethroid insecticides were observed in rice fields and orchards, although this was limited to a few areas. Specifically, pyrethroids, including cypermethrin (EC 40%) and deltamethrin (EC 2.5%), were reported in approximately 17% of the areas, respectively (Table 1). Notably, no mosquito larvae were found in breeding habitats that contained dragonfly nymphs or Gambusia fish, both of them are natural predators of mosquito larvae (Table 1).

Table 1 History of consumption of organic and chemical substances used in mosquito larval habitats in Khoda-Afarin, Iran, 2023

The species exhibited varied reactions to organophosphorus and organochlorine insecticides, demonstrating complete resistance to DDT while being sensitive to malathion. They displayed similar responses to carbamate and pyrethroid insecticides. Specifically, bendiocarb, permethrin, and deltamethrin, tested in two repetitions, resulted in mortality rates between 97 and 98% (Table 2).

Table 2 Resistance status of Anopheles sacharovi to different insecticides in Khoda-Afarin County, Northwest Iran, 2023

Discussion

Iran launched a malaria elimination initiative in 2009, aiming to achieve certification by 2025 [4, 25]. The primary strategies for controlling and preventing malaria in the country consist of five key interventions: IRS in households, distribution of free LLINs for all people at risk of malaria, providing complimentary malaria diagnosis and treatment (active and passive case detection), conducting emergency space fogging, and manipulating or physically eliminating mosquito breeding places [26]. Therefore, insecticide-based mosquito control remains critically important in vector control strategies in this country [9].

Currently, chemical control methods against malaria vectors are limited to the southeastern regions of Iran [27]. Major challenges in these infected areas stem from the conflict in Afghanistan and the migration of a large population into various parts of Iran in 2022, alongside legal and illegal fuel trade with malaria-endemic regions of Pakistan. This migration and trade have contributed to the importation of malaria cases from neighboring countries, leading to the re-emergence of malaria in southeastern Iran. Some of these malaria reservoirs travel to other provinces of Iran where potential malaria vectors exist. therefore, health systems in these areas must be prepared to deal with possible outbreaks [28, 29].

Anopheles sacharovi is a potential vector of malaria in northwestern Iran, the anthropophily index of this species is notably high (38.5%), and this species was identified as a crucial vector during malaria outbreaks in this region [8].

The current research assesses the susceptibility of An. sacharovi to various insecticides, including DDT, permethrin and deltamethrin, malathion, and bendiocarb in Khoda-Afarin County, situated in East Azerbaijan Province, northwestern Iran. Although pesticides such as cypermethrin EC 40% and deltamethrin EC 2.5% (pyrethroids), along with chlorpyrifos EC 40.8% and diazinon 8.3% (organophosphates), are employed in rice fields for agricultural pests control, but An. sacharovi remains sensitive to permethrin, bendiocarb, and malathion, which belong to the pyrethroid, carbamate, and organophosphate categories, respectively. Notably, this species shows complete resistance to DDT in the study area.

Monitoring of insecticide resistance in An. sacharovi has been conducted in various regions of northwestern and southern Iran over the years. In the work carried out, it was reported that in East Azerbaijan Province (Kaleybar County that Khoda-Afarin was part of this county historically) at 19 years ago, An.‌sacharovi exhibited resistance to DDT, tolerance to dieldrin, and susceptibility to malathion, permethrin, and deltamethrin [30]. In another investigation in this area, the susceptibility of An.‌sacharovi to several insecticides (DDT 4%, malathion 5%, permethrin 0.75%, dieldrin 0.4%, fenitrothion 1%, and deltamethrin 0.05%) was assessed, yielding similar results of resistance to DDT and tolerance to dieldrin, while demonstrating susceptibility to the rest [31].

A study performed in West Azerbaijan Province, bordering our study area, indicated that An.‌sacharovi was resistant to DDT and tolerant to dieldrin, while remaining susceptible to bendiocarb, cyfluthrin, deltamethrin, fenitrothion, lambdacyhalothrin, permethrin, malathion, propoxur, and etofenprox [32]. The findings of our research align with those of other studies in East and West Azerbaijan Provinces, showing that An.‌sacharovi is resistant to DDT and sensitive to permethrin, deltamethrin, malathion, and bendiocarb. Unfortunately, due to the unavailability of impregnated insecticide papers, we could not assess the resistance status of An. sacharovi to dieldrin.

In Ardabil Province, located to the northwest of Iran and adjacent to our study area, An.‌sacharovi was resistant to DDT [8], tolerant to permethrin 0.25% and deltamethrin 0.025%, and susceptible to malathion 5% and propoxur 0.1% [27]. Other studies revealed that, this species was resistant to both DDT and dieldrin, alongside sensitivity to malathion, lambdacyhalothrin, propoxur, deltamethrin, cyfluthrin, and bendiocarb in Ardabil Province [8, 32].

Our research aligns with findings from Ardabil Province, indicating that An. sacharovi exhibits resistance to DDT [8] while remaining sensitive to malathion and bendiocarb. However, in Ardabil Province this species showed tolerance to permethrin and deltamethrin. It seems that the reason for these differences is the widespread use of insecticides to control the vectors of zoonotic visceral Leishmaniasis in Ardabil province while such an operation is not carried out in the studied area.

In Fars Province, located in southwestern Iran, An.‌sacharovi is susceptible to DDT 4% and resistant to fenitrothion 1% [33]. The varying environmental conditions between the southern and northwestern regions of Iran can influence vector ecology and subsequently interactions with insecticides.

Anopheles sacharovi is a primary malaria vector in Turkey, particularly along Iran's northwest border [34]. In Turkey, its susceptibility to various insecticide results indicated that in regions like Adana, Antalya, and Adiyaman, this species was susceptible to malathion and pirimiphos-methyl. In Aydin, it was also susceptible to dieldrin, lambdacyhalothrin, and etofenprox, while in Mugla it was sensitive to nearly all insecticides tested, except for propoxur, bendiocarb, permethrin, deltamethrin, and DDT [35]. Unlike our findings, An. sacharovi in Turkey shows resistance to permethrin, deltamethrin, and bendiocarb. The differences may stem from the wide distribution of An. sacharovi in Turkey, exposing it to various insecticide groups used for both health and agricultural purposes over extended periods [35].

Present study found use of various herbicides and fertilizers, including silica, humic acid, superphosphate, sulfur, urea, and solopotas, as well as pesticides such as cypermethrin EC 40%, deltamethrin EC 2.5%, chlorpyrifos 40.8% EC, and diazinon 8.3%, in rice fields of the studied region. The application of these substances varies across different areas. However, we lacked the capacity to laboratory test each of these products on An. sacharovi.

The application of insecticides, as well as biological and chemical fertilizers in agricultural practices significantly impacts the resistance of Anopheles mosquitoes [36]. Research in Africa has revealed that in regions with high insecticide usage, resistance to commonly employed insecticides, including pyrethroids, has increased. This resistance diminishes the effectiveness of LLITs and IRS, which are crucial for malaria control strategies [37]. Another study evaluated the effects of chemical and biological fertilizers on mosquito populations, finding that chemical fertilizers heightened the abundance of mosquito larvae in rice fields, thus potentially increasing malaria transmission risks [36, 38]. Conversely, biological fertilizers such as organic matter or compost did not substantially affect mosquito numbers. While agricultural practices influence mosquito populations, they are just one several factors contributing to malaria transmission [36, 39] and other critical factors include climate, human behavior, and healthcare access [11,12,13]. A Kenyan study also linked the use of chemical fertilizers to increased resistance to pyrethroid insecticides in Anopheles mosquitoes [40].

In our study area, no mosquito larvae were caught in the habitats containing Gambusia fish, and the abundance of mosquito larvae was very low in the habitats with dragonfly nymphs. The use of Gambusia fish is effective in controlling the larvae of malaria vectors, and other mosquito genera [41, 42]. For example, a study illustrated that introducing Gambusia into water bodies notably reduced Anopheles mosquito populations, the primary malaria vector [43]. Another study in Iran demonstrated that integrating Gambusia fish with insecticide-treated bed nets significantly reduced malaria cases [44]. A study conducted in Africa showed that Culex mosquitoes avoid laying their egg rafts in containers containing predatory fish [45].

Research in Thailand also noted that introducing dragonflies in rice fields substantially diminished Aedes mosquito populations, which are the primary vectors of dengue fever [46]. In Malaysia, dragonfly presence in residential places correlated with reduced Aedes populations and lower dengue incidence [47]. Mosquitoes receive predator-released kairomones (PRKs) and therefore avoid laying eggs in larval habitats containing these predators. [48, 49]. These findings suggest that the chemical compounds produced by predators can serve as an environmentally friendly method for controlling mosquito populations [49].

To mitigate insecticide resistance among mosquitoes, health systems could adopt alternative control methods such as biological strategies. In this study, breeding sites with predators yielded no mosquito larvae, likely due to two reasons: direct predation by the predators and avoiding female mosquitoes from laying eggs in predator-rich breeding habitats [42]. However, natural enemies can effectively control mosquito’s larvae without side effects on environment and non-target organisms [17, 45, 50].

The findings from this study underscore the importance of ongoing insecticide resistance monitoring and the integration of sustainable control methods in malaria vector management. By demonstrating An. sacharovi's resistance to DDT and sensitivity to alternative insecticides, as well as the effectiveness of natural predators like Gambusia fish and dragonfly nymphs, this research supports the need for adaptive and multifaceted strategies in malaria control. Such strategies are vital for mitigating the impact of climate change, urbanization, and cross-border malaria transmission, thereby enhancing public health efforts in Iran and similar regions.

Conclusions

This study examines the susceptibility and resistance status of Anopheles sacharovi to various insecticides in East Azerbaijan Province, Iran. It highlights the complete resistance of this mosquito species to DDT while retaining sensitivity to malathion, bendiocarb, and certain pyrethroids. These findings underscore the urgent need for innovative malaria control strategies. Understanding the impact of agricultural pesticides and mosquito behavior is crucial for addressing management challenges. To effectively reduce mosquito populations and prevent the spread of vector-borne diseases, new control methods, particularly the integration of natural predators like Gambusia fish and dragonfly nymphs, should be emphasized. Continuous monitoring and research into resistance mechanisms are essential for enhancing public health initiatives against malaria and other mosquito-borne diseases.

Availability of data and materials

All data on which this article is based are included within the article.

Abbreviations

An . :

Anopheles

DDT:

Dichloro-Diphenyl-Trichloroethane

EC:

Emulsifiable Concentrate

EMRO:

Eastern Mediterranean Region

H:

Hour

IRS:

Indoor residual spraying

PRKs:

Predator-Released Kairomones

LLINs:

Long-lasting Insecticide-Treated Nets

N:

Sample size

SD:

Standard Deviation

WHO:

World Health Organization

%:

Percentage

References

  1. WHO. Global vector control response 2017–203. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Vieira RFC, Muñoz-Leal S, Faulkner G, Şuleşco T, André MR, Pesapane R. Global climate change impacts on vector ecology and vector-borne diseases. In: McNabb SJN, Shaikh AT, Haley CJ, editors. Modernizing global health security to prevent, detect, and respond. Amsterdam: Academic Press; 2024. p. 155–73.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Abdullah M, Hind I, Al K, Ahmed S, El-Hadeeti K, Elhadeeti SAK. The role of mosquitoes in transmitting some pathogens. 2022.

  4. WHO. World malaria report 2023. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2023.

    Google Scholar 

  5. WHO. World malaria report 2022. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2022.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Abbasi M, Oshaghi MA, Sedaghat MM, Hazratian T, Foroushani AR, Jafari-Koshki T, et al. Development of a degree-day model to predict the growth of Anopheles stephensi (Diptera: Culicidae): implication for vector control management. Environ Entomol. 2023;52:1126–1138. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1093/ee/nvad092

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Abbasi M, Foroushani AR, Jafari-Koshki T, Pakdad K, Vatandoost H, & Hanafi-Bojd AA. The impact of climatic variables on the population dynamics of the main malaria vector, Anopheles stephensi Liston (Diptera: Culicidae), in southern Iran. Asian Pac J Trop Med. 2020;13(10):448–455. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.4103/1995-7645.291038.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Yaghoobi-Ershadi MR, Namazi J, Piazak N. Bionomics of Anopheles sacharovi in Ardebil province, northwestern Iran during a larval control program. Acta Trop. 2001;78(3):207–15. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/s0001-706x(01)00080-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Abbasi M, Hanafi-Bojd, A, Yaghoobi-Ershadi MR, Vatandoost H, Oshaghi MA, Hazratian T et al. Resistance status of the main malaria vector, Anopheles stephensi Liston (Diptera: Culicidae), to insecticides in a malaria endemic area, southern Iran. Asian Pac J Trop Med. 2019;12(1):43–48. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.4103/1995-7645.250344.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Nkya TE, Poupardin R, Laporte F, Akhouayri I, Mosha F, Magesa S, et al. Impact of agriculture on the selection of insecticide resistance in the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae: a multigenerational study in controlled conditions. Parasit Vectors. 2014;7:480. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s13071-014-0480-z.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Fillinger U, Sonye G, Killeen GF, Knols BG, Becker N. The practical importance of permanent and semipermanent habitats for controlling aquatic stages of Anopheles gambiae sensu lato mosquitoes: operational observations from a rural town in western Kenya. Trop Med Int Health. 2004;9(12):1274–89. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1111/j.1365-3156.2004.01335.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tusting LS, Thwing J, Sinclair D, Fillinger U, Gimnig J, Bonner KE, et al. Mosquito larval source management for controlling malaria. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;2013(8):Cd008923. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1002/14651858.CD008923.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Ranson H, N’Guessan R, Lines J, Moiroux N, Nkuni Z, Corbel V. Pyrethroid resistance in African anopheline mosquitoes: what are the implications for malaria control? Trends Parasitol. 2011;27(2):91–8. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.pt.2010.08.004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kouadio FA, Wipf NC, Nygble AS, Fodjo BK, Sadia CG, Vontas J, et al. Relationship between insecticide resistance profiles in Anopheles gambiae sensu lato and agricultural practices in Côte d’Ivoire. Parasit Vectors. 2023;16(1):270. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s13071-023-05876-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Jeanrenaud A, Brooke BD, Oliver SV. The effects of larval organic fertiliser exposure on the larval development, adult longevity and insecticide tolerance of zoophilic members of the Anopheles gambiae complex (Diptera: Culicidae). PLoS ONE. 2019;14(4): e0215552. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1371/journal.pone.0215552.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Oliver SV, Brooke BD. The effect of commercial herbicide exposure on the life history and insecticide resistance phenotypes of the major malaria vector Anopheles arabiensis (Diptera: culicidae). Acta Trop. 2018;188:152–60. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.actatropica.2018.08.030.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Benelli G, Jeffries CL, Walker T. Biological control of mosquito vectors: past, present, and future. Insects. 2016. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3390/insects7040052.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Sarafraz S, Ghabouli Mehrabani N, Mirzaei Y, Jafari R, Ghabouli Mehrabani R, Rahnamaye Hayati V, et al. Epidemiology of malaria in East Azerbaijan province, Iran, from 2001 to 2013. J Parasit Dis. 2016;40(3):813–7. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s12639-014-0584-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Schapira A, Zaim M, Raeisi A, Ranjbar M, Kolifarhood G, Nikpour F, et al. History of the successful struggle against malaria in the Islamic Republic of Iran—from the earliest records to imminent elimination. 2018.

  20. Data TGHWaC. Khoda Afarin, East Azarbaijan, Iran climate 2024. https://weatherandclimate.com/iran/east-azarbaijan/khoda-afarin.

  21. Azari-Hamidian S, Harbach R. Keys to the adult females and fourth-instar larvae of the mosquitoes of Iran (Diptera: Culicidae). Zootaxa. 2009;2078:1–33. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.5281/zenodo.187282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Waldetensai A. Protocol for Anopheles mosquito Rearing and handling. 2020.

  23. WHO. Test procedures for insecticide resistance monitoring in malaria vector mosquitoes. 2nd ed. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  24. WHO. Manual for monitoring insecticide resistance in mosquito vectors and selecting appropriate interventions. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2022.

    Google Scholar 

  25. WHO. Malaria elimination: a field manual for low and moderate endemic countries. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Nikpour F, Vatandoost H, Hanafi-Bojd AA, Raeisi A, Mirolyaie A, Mojahedi AR, et al. Long-lasting residual efficacy of Actellic®300CS and Icon®10CS on different surfaces against Anopheles stephensi, an invasive malaria vector. Trop Med Int Health. 2024;29(9):781–91. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1111/tmi.14028.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Vatandoost H, Hanafi-Bojd AA, Nikpour F. Monitoring and mapping of insecticide resistance in malaria vector, Anopheles sacharovi in iran (1997–2020). Acta Sci Malaysia. 2021;5:75–9. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.26480/asm.02.2021.75.79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Raiesi A, Nejati J, Ansari-Moghaddam A, Sakeni M, Faraji L, Paktinat B, et al. Effects of foreign immigrants on malaria situation in cleared up and potential foci in one of the highest malaria burden district of southern Iran. Malaria J. 2012. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/1475-2875-11-S1-P81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hemami MR, Sari AA, Raeisi A, Vatandoost H, Majdzadeh R. Malaria elimination in iran, importance and challenges. Int J Prev Med. 2013;4(1):88–94.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Vatandoost H, Boonab R, Abai MR, Oshaghi M, Rassi Y, Gholizadeh S. Entomological survey in Kalibar, a rurgent malaria focus in East-Azerbaijan. Iran Pakistan J Biol Sci. 2005;8:466–71.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Vatandoost H. Irritability of malaria vector, Anopheles sacharovi to different insecticides in a malaria–prone area. Asian Pac J Trop Med. 2012;5:113–6. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/S1995-7645(12)60007-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Lak S, Vatandoost H, Entezarmahdi MR, Ashraf H, Nazari M. Monitoring of Insecticide resistance in Anopheles Sacharovi (Favre, 1903) in Borderline of Iran, Armenia, Naxcivan and Turkey, 2001. Iranian J Publ Health. 2002;31:96–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Ladonni SGH. Determination of susceptibility of Anopheles sacharovi collected from dasht argen in Fars province to DDT, malathion fenitrothion (Diptera, Culicidae). Iran J Public Health. 1970;28(1–4).

  34. Alten B, Caglar SS, Simsek FM, Kaynas S. Effect of insecticide-treated bednets for malaria control in Southeast Anatolia-Turkey. J Vector Ecol. 2003;28(1):97–107.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Kasap H, Kasap M, Alptekin D, Lüleyap U, Herath PR. Insecticide resistance in Anopheles sacharovi Favre in southern Turkey. Bull World Health Organ. 2000;78(5):687–92.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Kibuthu TW, Njenga SM, Mbugua AK, Muturi EJ. Agricultural chemicals: life changer for mosquito vectors in agricultural landscapes? Parasit Vectors. 2016;9(1):500. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s13071-016-1788-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Hien AS, Soma DD, Hema O, Bayili B, Namountougou M, Gnankiné O, et al. Evidence that agricultural use of pesticides selects pyrethroid resistance within Anopheles gambiae s.l. populations from cotton growing areas in Burkina Faso, West Africa. PLoS One. 2017;12(3):e0173098. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1371/journal.pone.0173098.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Darriet F. Synergistic effect of fertilizer and plant material combinations on the development of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) and Anopheles gambiae (Diptera: Culicidae) mosquitoes. J Med Entomol. 2018;55(2):496–500. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1093/jme/tjx231.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Victor TJ, Reuben R. Effects of organic and inorganic fertilisers on mosquito populations in rice fields of southern India. Med Vet Entomol. 2000;14(4):361–8. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1046/j.1365-2915.2000.00255.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Ochomo E, Subramaniam K, Kemei B, Rippon E, Bayoh NM, Kamau L, et al. Presence of the knockdown resistance mutation, Vgsc-1014F in Anopheles gambiae and An. arabiensis in western Kenya. Parasit Vectors. 2015;8:616. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s13071-015-1223-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Arijo A, Ahmad L, Sethar A, Muhammad F, Bhutto B, Leghari I, et al. Biological control of mosquito larvae using edible fish. 2017. https://journalijiar.com/article/549/biological-control-of-mosquito-larvae-using-edible-fish/.

  42. Singh H, Gupta SK, Vikram K, Saxena R, Srivastava A, Nagpal BN. Sustainable control of malaria employing Gambusia fishes as biological control in Jalore and Barmer districts of Western Rajasthan. J Vector Borne Dis. 2022;59(1):91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Walshe DP, Garner P, Adeel AA, Pyke GH, Burkot TR. Larvivorous fish for preventing malaria transmission. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;12(12):Cd008090. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1002/14651858.CD008090.pub3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Shahi M, Kamrani E, Shalehi M, Habibi R, Hanaf Bojd AA. Native larvivorous fish in an endemic malarious area of southern Iran, a biological alternative factor for chemical larvicides in malaria control program. Iran J Public Health . 2015;44(11):1544–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Segev O, Verster R, Weldon C. Testing the link between perceived and actual risk of predation: mosquito oviposition site selection and egg predation by native and introduced fish. J Appl Ecol. 2017;54(3):854–61. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1111/1365-2664.12789.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Chareonviriyaphap T, Bangs MJ, Suwonkerd W, Kongmee M, Corbel V, Ngoen-Klan R. Review of insecticide resistance and behavioral avoidance of vectors of human diseases in Thailand. Parasit Vectors. 2013;6:280. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/1756-3305-6-280.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Saleeza Ramlee S, Norma-Rashid N, Mohd SA. Odonata nymphs as potential biocontrol agents of mosquito larvae in Malaysia. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2022;53(4):426–35.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Hegazy MI, Hegazy AM, Saad AM, Salem HM, El-Tahan AM, El-Saadony MT, et al. ٍSome biologically active microorganisms have the potential to suppress mosquito larvae (Culex pipiens, Diptera: Culicidae). Saudi J Biol Sci. 2022;29(4):1998–2006. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.12.028.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Silberbush A, Markman S, Lewinsohn E, Bar E, Cohen JE, Blaustein L. Predator-released hydrocarbons repel oviposition by a mosquito. Ecol Lett. 2010;13(9):1129–38. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01501.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Huang YS, Higgs S, Vanlandingham DL. Biological control strategies for mosquito vectors of arboviruses. Insects. 2017. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3390/insects8010021.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors express their gratitude towards the Infectious and Tropical Research Centre for providing financial resources for this project, as well as the Disease Management Centre of the Ministry of Health in Iran, for supplying the WHO test papers. They also extend their thanks to the East Azerbaijan Health deputy and Khodafarin health centre for their support in the field, particularly Dr. Hossein Haqaei, Dr. Zeinal Saif Zadeh, Dr. Simin Khayatzadeh, Mr. Abdollah Akrami, Mr. Ali Abdollahi, and Mr. Ali Asadi.

Funding

This study received financial support from Infectious and Tropical Diseases Research Centre, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Madineh Abbasi conducted the original idea, field study, laboratory tests, and article writing, while Saideh Yousefi wrote the manuscript with support of Fatemeh Nikpour. All authors discussed the results and contributed to the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Madineh Abbasi or Saideh Yousefi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The ethics committee at Tabriz University of Medical Sciences (Ethics Code: IR.TBZMED.VCR.REC.1399.426) approved this protocol.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abbasi, M., Yousefi, S. & Nikpour, F. Assessing agricultural practices and insecticides resistance for effective malaria vector control in northwestern Iran. Trop Med Health 52, 81 (2024). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s41182-024-00653-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s41182-024-00653-w

Keywords